Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Viva Miami!


Chapter Seventeen
Lessons from Miami

The Miami Ad School
While at Crispin Porter + Bogusky I became aquainted with The Miami Ad School. The Miami Ad School is a unique phenomenon in advertising. It is one of a handful of places students can take time to build a portfolio of creative samples that they can leverage in interviews with the nation’s top agencies, and get a start in this competitive business. Miami is an unlikely hub for advertising. Unless you want a base of operations for international marketing communications. The tropical climate and the constant influx of tourists from around the world make it a vibrant and cosmopolitan place though. While working in Miami I was fortunate enough to become acquainted with Ron Siechrist, the founder of the Miami Ad School. Ron was instrumental in building the Portfolio Center on the same premise in Atlanta. (Legend has it that Ron had to turn over the keys to that successful business to his wife as part of a divorce settlement.) Ron Siechrist managed to start all over in Miami’s trendy South Beach with the Miami Ad School. The work produced by his students has captured the attention of Advertising Award Judges and Advertising Annuals and has resulted in some pretty impressive placements so far.

Hispanic Marketing: Like it or Not
I took High School Spanish. I took Spanish to meet the language requirement in college too. I know about enough Spanish to order coffee at the Versailles restaurant in Miami and that’s about it. I’m committed to lifelong learning but I’m afraid it would take me several lifetimes to learn to speak Spanish well. Some people have a gift for foreign languages. I’m not one of those people. Miami’s Dade County is more than 50% Hispanic. South Florida like Texas and California has areas with high Hispanic populations. Like it or not, you cannot expect to make a living in the communications business, especially in these parts of the country without learning the language they speak. Without a doubt, there are huge opportunities for advertising and marketing specialists who can speak Spanish and become experts in Hispanic Marketing. I know because I was there trying to drum up business for a hot shop. Even with a limited Spanish speaking staff, I was able to help Crispin Porter + Bogusky create advertising for The South Florida Mercedes Benz Dealer Group. (We produced advertising in English and Spanish).

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Let it Rain.


Chapter Fifteen
There’s No Business Like New Business

The agency, I think, felt somewhat responsible for recruiting me to join the firm, at a reduced salary. They could have asked me to work on other accounts. But, even at a reduced salary, I was the highest paid account manager in the place. The other accounts in this shop were staffed adequately, they thought. They needed new business. I needed a job. By default, I become the new business guy. The fine art of “rainmaking” at an advertising agency (of any size) is a mysterious mix of responsibility, consensus building, relationship building and public relations. It’s also, in spite of its importance, the most uncomfortable of chairs in the advertising agency game of musical chairs.

The Rainmaker
After working in advertising agencies all of my adult life, I have come to realize the importance of business development. Maintaining existing accounts is, of course, paramount to financial health of any advertising agency. Acquisition of new accounts is always costly. But there’s this thing called the “leaky bucket” theory that says that you’re always losing customers no matter what you’re selling. So in advertising agencies, as in other businesses, you have to do two things: 1. Plug up the holes where you can and 2. Keep filling the bucket. Enter the rainmaker. He comes to a dusty town in the middle of a drought and promises a badly needed downpour. Burt Lancaster played this role in the movie in 1957, The Rainmaker. If Burt worked for an advertising agency he’d inspire confidence and faith in the future. On the other hand, he’s also be accused of being an imposter and a scam artist. Really the hardest part of being the new business point man is building consensus. What do we really want? What kind of accounts will help us get there? There are big accounts that wouldn’t know a superior creative solution if it hit them over the head. There are small accounts that will always be small accounts. There are accounts who say they want great creative but also insist on a laundry list of mandatories. There are only about 600 agencies billing over $25MM in the U.S. Available advertising dollars are not infinite. The leading expert on the subject says about $162 Billion dollars was spent on advertising in 1995. More than a third of that is hoarded by big monolithic agencies headquartered in places like New York, Chicago and LA. Technology is making it possible to create and place advertising from anywhere. So agencies can pursue business anywhere they have FedEx, phones and fax machines. You can pursue big time clients where-ever they live. We simply can’t grow and continue to produce the kind of work we want to produce for a hundred small accounts. Remember a Rainmaker is paid for thunderstorms not squalls. So scam artist or not, the rainmaker reminds us to “keep the faith” and be very very patient. The Rainmaker is one of the most sought after hired guns in the advertising business. In reality, you need to be much more than a confidence man to be successful at the game of bringing in new business to an ad agency.

To all you rainmakers out there. You know who you are. Let it pour.

This article was prepared in 1995 and included in the book Plan. Design. Execute. Naturally the numbers are different today as the world is changing rapidly. However, the point is still relevant – to make it rain you need to be prospecting all the time.  

Friday, September 14, 2012

The Band Gets Back Together

















September 13, 2012 at Forest Park Golf Course

“Where are we going lads?”

“To the toppermost!”

The Beatles were just at the beginning of their journey in Liverpool when they seemed to know they were going to achieve notoriety. Don’t we all feel this way early in our careers? That optimism is always there when the future looks so full of possibilities.

It’s already September and it has been too long since Tom, Dave, Rowdy and Wes have assembled to play 18 holes. Years ago we had the ambition and energy to plan golf junky weekends in the Ozarks that were packed with 36 holes a day. More recently our lives have settled into a preoccupation with kids in college, business prospects and navigating a dicey economy in the midst of an election year.

Our 7:30 a.m. tee-time at Forest Park (Hawthorn and Dogwood nines) is set, Dave is already putting when I arrived at 7:00. Pretty soon Tom joins us and in the parking lot with a box of donuts is Rowdy. We are back! We like to reference the Beatles because we all remember a time when that historic magical musical four-some started to move in different directions. It ain’t London’s Apple Studios’ rooftop but we’re are calmly ready to perform. Game on!

That first hit always sets a tone (but it is almost never a good indicator of how the whole round will go). Rowdy is ready and hits a perfect drive into position A. Tom tops his drive and accepts the less than optimal start (followed by an incredibly smooth a 18 holes afterwords). Dave is long – almost too long to make an easy angle approach shot. (He’s rusty and preoccupied with business that will resume with a conference call this afternoon). I am short but in the “highly overrated” fairway short grass.

 As the round unfolds: Tom is completely relaxed. Dave’s eagle putt opportunity is spoiled when somehow his drive on Dogwood #4 is friek-ishly knocked off the green. (After that, Dave finished the final 5 holes with with marginal concentration.  Rowdy is not 100% happy with his game or his weight. (In spite of the donuts, he’s planning to lose about 20 pounds). I’m humbled as I consider how my game measures up to my pals. (Secretly, I’m delighted breaking 100 and not embarrassing myself too badly.)

Leave it to Tom to put the day in perspective. His e-mail the very next day:

Every once in a while, sometimes around my birthday, sometimes not, I wonder how
many more days I have, how many more times I might get to be with my friends.

Yesterday, when I saw the sun rising, I just knew the day was going to be very
special.

I'm very grateful to you three. Very, very grateful.
Best,

Tom Shaughnessy









Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Succession Plan of a Great Man


The story of FSK’s succession plan 
as reported in the St. Louis Business Journal
Jan. 27-Feb. 2, 2006 edition – Vol. 26 No. 22-80 pages

I was a little anxious to follow up with Fred Kummer about an article that appeared in the Friday 1/27/06 edition of the St. Louis Business Journal. The article was a result of writer Rick Desloge taking an interest in doing a story about a number of new contracts at HBE – notably the more than $116 Million in contracts from McLaren Health Care. After rescheduling the meeting with Desloge twice, a meeting was set for 9AM on Tuesday (1/24/06). Rick arrived and the three of us (Fred, Rick and myself) sat down at the big conference style table in Fred’s office on the sixth floor. “Rick, we ahhhh well we’re doing work all over. We have projects in California and ya know I just got back from Flagstaff, Arizona where we presented to the flagship hospital in a system…we did some work in Cottonwood for them and ahhhh…” in classic Fred Kummer speak the interview was off and rambling. “Fred, Wes suggested I ask you about McLaren,” Rick interjected. “Yeah, well this ad here that we put together tells you about
that,” Fred responded with a print of a recent ad that includes a breakdown of contract amounts and square footages of the projects at McLaren’s hospitals in Michigan cities of Flint, Lansing, Lapeer and Bay City.” I sensed that Rick was relieved that he had something in writing and with numbers that substantiate something of a story at least. I was relieved that Rick had shifted the focus to projects that could be mentioned an article (versus projects HBE had not yet won).

The meeting went on with friendly exchanges between Fred and Rick. Rick only periodically jotting notes. It was clear to me that Rick would rely on Fred for color and me for facts until we began to venture in uncharted waters. “Ya know Rick, I have plans for this company to go on beyond me. It’s gonna mean …ya know Lonnie Lange had done a number of big projects in St. Louis and Lonnie is our Chief Operating Officer.” Fred went on to mention Greg Beck, HBE’s CFO and Gary Maier, HBE VP Project Development. Fred rolled out some information about a plan to sell 15-20% to key managers of the company within the next two years. (Totally off script and not planned.) The meeting went on for an hour and about 20 minutes. Rick pleaded with me to sit with him a bit so he could “Stitch together a story.” Naturally I agreed. “No, Rick I don’t think the Flagstaff information is timely – we don’t have a project yet…. The Bakersfield, California project is about $42 Million (San Joaquin Community Hospital) and is in progress… The regulators in California are “OSHPD” which stands for Office of Statewide Healthcare Planning and Development. These and a dozen other details, most of which did not make it to the final article but allowed him convince his editor that the story was of interest.

Rick Desloge called me several more times and I called him once to asked him to talk to Fred one more time. Fred was uncomfortable not having mentioned more people so in a follow up phone call Fred gave up a few more names – not confirming anything about the ownership transition – he mentioned Fred Scott, Ed Eslinger, Jim Kee, Kurt Kruger and Jerry Patterson. It had to be getting pretty close to deadline for the Edition that hits some newsstands on Thursday evening,

This is what the St. Louis Business Journal Article Said:
Kummer selling HBE stake to top managers
By Rick Desloge rdesloge@bizjournals.com

Fred Kummer Jr., the 77-year-old founder of HBE Corp., plans to transfer 15 to 20 percent of the giant design and construction firm to its key managers within the next two years. That will pave the way for Kummer eventually to sell the rest of HBE to a private investment firm that would keep the company operating. Creve Coeur-based HBE specializes in designing and building medical and banking facilities. “I either had to set up a succession plan or live forever,” Kummer said. Kummer built HBE into a $410 million-in-revenue powerhouse, with 6,000 employees, including 400 at its Creve Coeur headquarters. Kummer owns 100 percent of the firm, which construction industry executives said could easily be worth $300 million. The company also owns five Adam’s Mark Hotels, which Kummer said he does not plan to sell. Kummer said he is working with HBE’s in-house attorneys on details to get HBE stock to employees but is not working with any investment banking firms. Engineering and construction businesses can be hard to sell because the assets are the people who run the business, said Paul Schoebelen III, managing director of the Fortune Group in Clayton, an investment banking firm for private businesses. “That’s why most of these businesses end up being employee owned.” Investment firms have offered to buy the HBE design-build business over the years, Kummer said, and for the last couple of years he has been asking himself and his management, “Can this company survive without Fred Kummer? I hope it doesn’t have to for a while.” HBE’s Lonnie Lange, the company’s chief operating officer, is expected to lead the employee ownership group. He joined the business last year after stints at McCarthy and Jacobs Engineering. Gary Maier, HBE’s vice president of development who has been with the company 30 years, and Greg Beck, the company’s executive vice president and chief financial officer who joined the business in 2003, also will be part of the employee ownership group. Kummer said that group likely would be between five and 15 executives. Other key HBE employees expected to be in the ownership group include Jim Kee, vice president of construction; Ed Eslinger, president of HBE’s Hospital Designers; Jerry Patterson, senior vice president of national sales for HBE Financial Facilities; and Kurt Kruger, senior vice president of HBE’s hospital division. For Kummer, who is known for his hands-on control of most aspects of the business, the succession plan comes as HBE is starting 2006 with more than $116 million in hospital construction projects from one client alone” McLaren Health Care in Flint, Mich. HBE is building four medical centers for McLaren, which operates in central Michigan. Nearly all of HBE’s work is in other parts of the country, though the financial facilities side of the business completed local projects for Anheuser-Busch Employees’ Credit Union and three branches for First Community Credit Union within the past three years. Kummer started the business with his wife, June, in 1960. The couple has three grown children, though none works for HBE. Fred Kummer III, previously an executive vice president with Adam’s Mark, left the company after a dispute with his father in 2002 over how HBE was handling the Adam’s Mark operations. The elder Kummer ultimately sold 19 of the hotels and retained five, including the Adam’s Mark in downtown St.Louis. HBE has been ranked among the largest private companies in St. Louis, and last year the Business Journal placed it at No. 32 among local private firms, based on its $385 million in 2004 revenue. “There’s nothing else on its scale in St. Louis, and the company has had a dominant position in the health-care market for years,” said Karl Kloster, president of the Midwest division of McCarthy, the largest construction company based in St. Louis.
Shifting a company the size of HBE to a new ownership structure could require years of work, Kloster said. McCarthy, which is 65% controlled by an employee stock-ownership plan and 35 percent owned by senior managers, took 12 years to complete a transition from a family owned business to an employee-owned business. The new ownership structure at McCarthy included buying back shares held by other McCarthy family members, a step Kummer would not have to negotiate. Alberici Constructors, the region’s second largest contracting firm, has 90 stockholders at the company, and John Alberici, its chairman, holds a majority of the voting shares. 

While Kummer placed a two-year timetable on transferring 15 percent to 20 percent of HBE to key management, he does not have a time frame for selling his other 80 percent interest in the business. “If retiring is doing the things you like, I’m already doing the things I like.”

FSK to DBIA


The following speech provides some insight into Fred’s approach to design-build. I was intimately involved in preparing this presentation with Fred. All things considered he delivered the message uncharacteristically well at an annual Design Build Institute of America (DBIA) session held at a hotel owned by the man himself.

Fred Kummer Keynote Speech 
to Design-Build Institute of America
October 13, 1999 
at the Adam’s Mark Hotel in Dallas

Good Afternoon. I’m very pleased to be here today – and talk about Design-Build the way we have practiced it for 40 years. HBE Design-Build method is not for every project and it won’t work for every company, but for us it has been the key to our success. Design-Build is what my company HBE is all about. Some people have called me a legend in the industry. What they mean is that I am an old guy. And by that standard, I AM a legend. In fact, we’ve done very well over the years. We’ve made a great many customers happy. We’ve built a lot of buildings. We’ve built a chain of hotels-You’re sitting in one now. We limit our construction activities principally in three industries: Health Care, Financial Facilities and Hotels. So today I want to tell you about HBE, what we do, why we believe we are successful, and what our methods can mean to the construction industry. Yes, I believe it is the CONSTRUCTION industry and NOT architecture, engineering, and construction as separate disciplines. Everything we do at HBE – and everything we’ve done since I started the company back in 1960 – is based on one idea. We deliver VALUE to our customers. Value means a functional building that does what our clients need at a price that allows them to build. Value also means satisfying our clients’ needs in line with their priorities. It means working with our client to understand what his priorities are and to respond to those priorities to the fullest extent possible, given the resources available. Every project is different. Every client’s priorities are different. If image is a top priority, perhaps a lavish lobby makes sense. If instead, a hospital needs more operating rooms, that’s where the client should put his money. It’s our job to help our client fully understand the options AND cost associated with those options so that a value judgment can be made. A judgment only the client can make. There are people who know the COST of everything, but they know the VALUE of nothing. You have to know the value of something before you can determine if it justifies its cost. Sometimes the client is a hospital administrator who sees his facility is too old and run down. The ideal might be to abandon and replace that hospital. But that might cost $16 million and he might not have $16 million to make that happen. In that case, the best value for that client might be to spend $8 million to renovate his existing facility. It might not be ideal, but it is realistic. Often we come into a hospital or financial facility and analyze the cost of a new building vs. alterations and additions to the existing building. It forces our clients to make judgments. And they can only make these judgments if they know the costs so they can make the value judgment for their alternatives. This is an enormous responsibility for us and for our clients.

Design-Build is only possible when you have a cohesive organization that looks at value and cost simultaneously. Cost does not necessarily equal value (a difficult idea for many), but value cannot be measured without understanding cost. I’ll bet everyone in this room has a VCR at home. You can buy a basic one for about $200. For $400 you can get a lot of buttons and switches. Now if you need those buttons and switches, they are a value to you. But if you don’t they are just a cost. In designing a building the same thing is true. You have to look at the cost and value of every button and switch.

Remember, you might not get what you pay for, but you will always pay for what you get. One option might be to put a three story marble atrium in a hospital lobby. Is that the best use of resources? Maybe and maybe not. But if that atrium means that doctors and nurses don’t have room to deliver care to their patients, that hospital hasn’t maximized value, it has maximized cost and probably reduced value. Forty years ago – Design-Build, as we practiced it, was used only on relatively small, less complicated projects. Some of my early ones were a donut shop, a car wash, a restaurant and a small bank – none of them – I don’t think – exceeded $100,000. An owner would go to a builder and describe his needs in terms of both cost and function. The builder would work with architects, engineers, and specialty contractors of his choosing to put together the complete package. The contractor would price the project as a lump sum proposal. If the proposal met with the owner’s approval, the project moved forward. If for any reason it did not meet with the owner’s approval, the contractor bore all of the costs of developing the project to that point. This gave the contractor an incentive to control costs while providing value to the owner. Providing value to the owner is the key to success of any project – no matter what the delivery method. If you want to be successful in Design-Build business, you must develop a reputation for value and reliability. I know – some may say our method of Design-Build is still the way smaller uncomplicated projects are done but that it won’t work on bigger more complex projects. I hear you, and I know that most organizations may not be able to function the way we do. But HBE has designed and built nearly $7 Billion worth of hospitals, financial facilities and hotels using this method and this method only. We sometimes have as much as $3 million at risk on one project before we have a contract for a building. That is putting the risk where it belongs, with the design-build firm.

Our work is not the $100 million projects. In fact the largest project we have done for others is in the range of $50 million. We have built more than 1,100 projects in every state of the union except Alaska. Every one of them used a contracting method that many don’t think will work with major institutional projects. Design-Build, as we practice it, will not work for every project and every client. Clients must have confidence in their ability to make the same value judgments they make when they hire an architectural and engineering firm for design and then move to construction. Design-Build should face up to the idea of reward for performance in creating value. Many firms are not willing or able to assume the risk this requires. The contractor must be at risk in a very significant way for a process to be called design build.

As I said a minute ago, we sometimes have as much as $3 million at risk on a single project. In the distant past, projects were built by someone called a Master Builder. In fact, most of the world’s enduring structures were built by Master Builders. The pyramids, The Sphinx, even the Statue of Liberty were the work of Master Builders. The Master Builder was the person with the vision, skills, tools, people and the experience to get the job done. In Design-Build you must also have a Master Builder. Design-Build is not and cannot be simply having all of the players in the construction process in the same room and saying each should do his thing. Design-Build must be lead by the Master Builder. In my judgment this is the contractor, for his is the one with the greatest up-front risk. For a builder to function in Design-Build arena, he and his staff have to have a total understanding of all the pieces and parts of the process – and a full understanding of the cost implications of those pieces and parts. The old Master Builder may have had a saw, a plane, a hammer – the new Master Builder has architects, mechanical engineers, and concrete suppliers. He must know how to use all of those resources to deliver value to the client.

Cost-Plus does not have to produce value; it only has to produce cost. At HBE, we produce outstanding value, which is quickly and easily identified by our clients. This means we spend more time and money looking at options because it is in our economic interest to find the most effective solution and the greatest value for our clients.

At HBE, Design-Build works because everyone is involved in the process from the beginning – our clients, our architects, our engineers, and our builders. We don’t want designs that can’t be implemented efficiently and effectively. We design our buildings to be built, operated and used. Early planning is critical to the success of a project. You can save big money early in the planning process. That’s where millions of dollars can be saved or wasted many times tens of millions. In developing a project, you can save tens of hundreds or thousands of dollars and sometimes a million or two. In the building process you can save nickels and dimes by comparison. The big differences come in the early planning. That only happens when everyone is engaged from the beginning. Design-Build is not about everyone trying to get a bigger piece of the pie. Design-build is about working together on the pie. This is where you need the leadership of the master builder. You can put the best folks in the world together in a room but without a Master Builder they won’t come up with the best solution.

The Master Builder must make sure that all of the various disciplines communicate with each other. Engineers, architects, and construction people often speak different languages – and stress different values. If they don’t figure out how to talk to each other and share those values – nothing gets done well. You all remember the story of the Tower of Babel. I was just a kid back then, but I remember it as one of the first great design-build projects. Those people were going to build a tower to Heaven – reach right up to God. Everyone was working together – because they all spoke the same language. But God wasn’t having any of THAT, thank you.

So just as the architect was suggesting that the tower needed a marble atrium, God made them all speak different languages. And that was the end of THAT project.
Design-build works only when we’re all speaking the same language. Architects, engineers, and builders need to be able to share their ideas and concerns in a way that makes sense to everyone in the room. And they have to LISTEN to each other. We’ve all been in meetings where the guy who talked the most had the least to say. You don’t learn by talking – you learn by listening. You have to listen to find out what the building’s about – what the client needs – where the value is for the client and how we can maximize that value. A Master Builder is like an orchestra conductor. It is the conductor’s job to lead 100 musicians to make music but while respecting what the composer intended. In the same sense, the Master Builder has to be a broad perspective guy who directs the efforts of his team. Of course, it has to be in the context of the client’s priorities and values. Recently, we presented designs for a nursing unit in Indiana. We designed it with a mixture of private and semi-private rooms. One physician on the board insisted that all the rooms be private. That led to a lot of discussion. That is something the board will have to decide, not us. Our job is to give them information about costs of the various options but not to make the ultimate decision. Once they’ve made their decision our job is to build the facility they have decided is the best value for them. You know there are a lot of awards around in our business – and it’s fun to win one now and again. But the only award that means anything to me is the one that comes from our clients, the people who use the building we build. At HBE we design buildings to win awards from our clients. There is a real need for creativity in the design-build process. But creativity must be directed to solving real problems – not  created or imagined ones. I’m talking about true creativity – looking for the best way to make a building do what it needs to do both aesthetically and functionally.

Once we know our client’s needs and budget, everyone at the table is focused on finding creative practical solutions for every aspect of the project. They work as checks and balances to each other. I think a lot of us forget what business we’re in. We’re in the building business. We are not in the master planning business, or the drafting business. We are in the Building business. The value for everyone involved is in the product – the finished building. We spend the required amount on planning to maximize value; sometimes that amount may exceed any preconceived budget. That’s because we consider it so important to understand the client’s need and dealing with the constraints of budgets. We feel strongly that for a project to be successful the client and we must have to reach a mutual understanding of these wants, needs and budget. That is a difficult and time-consuming process, but it’s the only way a project can achieve the value we talked about earlier. This is the heart of design-build. It’s all focused on the finished building. 40% of our business is for clients who have already been through a design process. In some cases they have invested a lot of money in working drawings and consulting services that do not meet their needs – nor can they afford. In many cases they cannot afford to build projects they have just paid to develop. By understanding and then concentrating on what’s really important, we have often delivered a building that works for them at a cost they can afford. It’s easy to over-engineer a solution. Looking inside today’s hospitals and you’ll find very complicated mechanical and electrical systems. That’s because we have demanding complicated needs – so many changes of air, difficult balances along with energy considerations. The tendency of engineers is to design using the latest stat-of-the-art systems. But mechanical and electrical systems are almost never designed with the operators in mind - they are the people who will ultimately determine the value of the systems. Over the years, I have seen millions of dollars of abandoned systems that were too complicated or too sophisticated for the people who have run them. This does not produce value to the customer. It produces negative value. But it does produce cost. It is the job of the leader – the Master Builder – to see that this doesn’t happen. The latest state of the art equipment may be attractive from an engineering point-of-view but if the client can’t operate it - it has no value, especially when a simpler and less costly system that will in the long run provide better service.

At HBE: If we don’t do our job, we don’t get paid. Our business is to design and build to meet clients’ needs – and to be paid for our work. If we develop a project that can’t be financed, we’re not paid – and we don’t deserve to be. If we develop a project that doesn’t meet our needs, we’re not paid – and we don’t deserve to be. But you know what? That doesn’t happen. Because we design buildings to be built. To be a value for our client. To be a value for us. It’s not magic. It’s not genius. It’s surely not cost-plus. We think hard. We design hard. We work hard.

It’s what we do every day at HBE. I’m proud to have you all in my building. I’m happy to have spent this time with you. Thank you.

Show Me the Money!


Gold Mark Rewards at Adam's Mark Hotels

Continuity programs designed to get repeat business and cultivate brand loyalty are pretty common in the hotel and travel industries. But when you only have 24 independent hotels in places as diverse as Memphis, TN; Mobile, Alabama and Indianapolis, Indiana you might have a tough time competing with much bigger chains. In addition, the promotional trend toward adding partnerships with airlines and rental car companies put Adam’s Mark at a disadvantage for attracting reward-seeking frequent travelers. Fred was determined to respond with CASH. His idea was to reward people reaching certain tiers of patronage money back in the form of a check. 3%, 4% and 5% levels could be reached within the year in which customers spending a lot of money with Adam’s Mark Hotels and get money back. The Gold Mark Rewards marketing fell to me. To make this long story short – it caused a research firm and its findings to be ignored, an advertising agency to be fired and lots of cash disbursements to customers who probably would have stayed at Adam’s Mark anyway. (No way to tell – the research firm was fired and there was no interest in hiring another one to measure the program’s success).

As a side note: FSK was delighted to feature a favorite word in a series of ads for Gold Mark Rewards - Fungible. 

HBE and the DoJ


Janet Reno, the Department of Justice and the Adam’s Mark Hotels & Resorts.

A lot of people would say that the FSK, for all his faults and gruff exterior, must be doing something right. Granted, the company has seen tremendous growth for the founder. Growth, however, that cannot be closely scrutinized because the company is private. The ups and downs of the firm are not as easy to spot as a publicly traded firm that must disclose indicators about its fiscal health. Nothing paints a clearer picture of the organization, perhaps than the reaction and events surrounding the charges in December of 1999 by Janet Reno, the United States Attorney General, that Adam’s Mark Hotels and Resorts have practiced discrimination at its properties. The Adam’s Mark Hotels and Resorts, in 1999 had 24 hotels in 13 states. Most were designed with large ballrooms and space ideal for group business. One of the larger properties was ideally situated in Daytona Beach.

Circumstances surrounding the Black College Reunion weekend in Daytona Beach, Florida and black guests at the Adam’s Mark Hotel in Daytona Beach who claimed the hotel discriminated against them during that busy weekend. The original complaints about treatment received during the weekend in June of 1999 – based on the facts of the case would have been dismissed a dozen times. The complaints revolved around, among other things, the hotel’s practice of asking hotel guests to wear wristbands and provide deposits if they were not paying by credit card. He could have admitted that his hotel employees could have been more sensitive to these patrons and that action would be taken to assure that the greatest care would be given to guarantee equal treatment for all hotel guests in the future. Instead, digging in his heels, Fred Kummer and his hotel chain became a good target. FSK insisted that the hotel had done nothing wrong. His very stubbornness allowed a class-action time and fuel to be joined by the NAACP and eventually the Attorney General of the State of Florida and finally the United States Attorney General. “It’s hard to believe that in this day and age that a pattern of racial discrimination can still exist…the Department of Justice is investigating the Adam’s Mark Hotel & Resorts chain…” The U.S. Attorney General, Janet Reno, gave FSK the equivalent of a hot foot! Reno’s remarks were broadcast and
rebroadcast on national television and radio. The charges had a devastating effect on business for the hotel chain. Groups stopped booking the Adam’s Mark and others scrambled to back out of their earlier commitments. No group wants to hold an annual meeting at a venue that may cause protests. No meeting planners want to deal with individuals that cancel their plans based on the charges of discrimination. It was a no win situation for meeting planners. So rather than deal with the flack – they selected another hotel. The hopelessly inarticulate FSK was stuck between a rock and a hard place. His dilemma was as twisted as the suspect being interrogated with the opening question: “Have you stopped beating your wife?”

Quickly, Fred Kummer scrambled to hire lawyers and crisis communications specialists, but it was too late. The case was too broadly known and the damage to bookings was too severe for Fred and his beleaguered hotel chain. By February 2000, HBE/ Adam’s Mark offered to settle the case with the Department of Justice (DoJ). The employee training and provisions of the settlement would cost upwards of $8 Million. Fred would admit no wrongdoing, lose a ton of business from the bad publicity and never fully recover from the charges. The original case was thrown out but once the settlement was in force Fred Kummer could not back out. Even with the Republican Administration and the new U.S. Attorney General (John Ashcroft from Missouri), Fred’s PR was too hot to handle. In spite of campaign contributions – John Ashcroft could not lighten the burden on FSK.

At one point Fred Kummer asked me to find him a writer who could help him tell his story. Indeed, he would have an interesting view of the injustice of the situation. Unfortunately, he abandoned the project in favor of trying to rebuild his hotel business.